
Akinola Adebisi, Psychiatrist, NYU
20 December 2019
Comment on ‘The vulnerability paradox in global mental health and its applicability to suicide’
Michel Duckers et al, present a fascinating paper that aims to confirm an inverse association between country vulnerability and mental health. They cite studies indicating that the higher levels of individualism, more equal distribution of power, low masculinity and greater indulgence within
However, the papers premise is not fully convincing, the study was only able to include results from upper and middle income countries – there was only data from 1 lower income and as a result the low income category could not be included in the statistical analysis. Hence the paper explores the only upper and middle income countries. So, at best the article could argue for the vulnerability paradox in Middle and upper income countries. There is no reason to project the results on to low income nations without the data. The reasons for lack of good data on suicide rates from low income countries is multi factorial but stigma is likely to play a role in addition to lack of resources. Even if data did exist for low income nations, the much higher mortality rates of lower income countries from other methods including accidents, homicide and war would make comparison difficult (2).
References:
(1) American Psychological Association: Monitor on Psychology//2019//03//Worrying trends in U.S. suicide rates.
(2) Data from World Health Organization Estimated Deaths 2015